In a statement shared on social media, Sabry said he had previously addressed the Cambridge Union and understood the importance of engaging with difficult questions in an open forum. He said that these debating chambers are at their best when challenging issues are met with constructive discussion.
He described it as regrettable that an invitation extended in that tradition had to be withdrawn due to organised pressure, adding that when dialogue gives way to disruption, opportunities to bridge divides and challenge narratives in a civilised manner are lost.
"Sri Lanka’s future and genuine reconciliation cannot be built through echo chambers or refusal to engage. Those who hold opposing views must be willing to meet, question and listen. Silencing voices does not strengthen democracy; it weakens the very ideals universities are meant to uphold.
I remain hopeful that such historic institutions will continue to be arenas for debate, not battlegrounds for intimidation, and that meaningful conversations about our country can still take place with maturity and respect," Sabry said.